Subject:
|
Re: running bot
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:50:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1640 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Dave Johann writes:
> In lugnet.robotics, Travis Kunce writes:
> > has anyone ever actually made a lego bot that meets the definition of
> > running? Lately there have been a lot of bots like the Twirp and my own Son
> > of Walker, that basically meet the definition of walking, in that during
> > their stride they fall forward or backward. I'd like to work on some thing
> > that runs, or encourage everyone to try as well.
> > I'm interested in finding an example of and building my own bot that moves
> > forward in a propulsive manner where legs and feet that move in a relatively
> > smooth cycle and propel the bot off the ground for a second during stride.
> >
> > thanks in advance
> >
> > -tk
>
> Every 'walker' type of bot I've seen that professes the ability to run has
> only been able to take a
> couple of steps before it falls flat on it's face. It seems that they don't
> have the ability to balance
> and rebound from the steps they're taking.
>
> I wish I could remember the exact links, but I can't. Try LUGNET's link
> pages-I'm fairly certain
> that's where I found the site full of walkers.
Here is a sight that I'm a fan of:
http://www.geocities.com/technicpuppy/lblinks.html
Kevin
>
> -Dave
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: running bot
|
| (...) Every 'walker' type of bot I've seen that professes the ability to run has only been able to take a couple of steps before it falls flat on it's face. It seems that they don't have the ability to balance and rebound from the steps they're (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
