| | Erroded axles
|
|
Hallo to everyone first, sorry to all language purists, it's not my native language. I like treaded vehicles so i built very simple one using rubber treads from RIS 1.5 set. ( actually it was "tank" very similar to "dozer" from RIS 1.0, but without (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: A very inspiring design
|
|
(...) Hammerhead is very tricky to adjust correctly. I'll be putting some more tips on how to achieve it properly on my site. Miguel Agullo (URL) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | Re: Pneumatics: the old and the new
|
|
Very nice design. I don't have access to old style pneumatic cylinders, but was thinking of doing something similar with the new double acting cylinders. Because I don't have a check valve in the new pneumatics that would allow me to store vacuum, I (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: A very inspiring design
|
|
Very cool. Should be able to do it with two motors. I wonder how he sync's the left and right feet. It doesn't look like any sensors are used, or am I missing the wires? I am inspired. P.S. I was also inspired by hammerhead. Since I only had the 9v (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | Re: A very inspiring design
|
|
(...) Hey, I said *inspiring* ;-) Actually, if you're familiar with Hammerhead (a MOC on my site) or other ankle-bending bipeds, you'll see how Joe has come up with new aand refreshing solutions for this kind of robots. If you're not so specialized (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | Re: A very inspiring design
|
|
(...) next book? (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | A very inspiring design
|
|
Hi all, This new robot by Joe Nagata integrates so many solutions in such a simple design that I have little doubt it will be as instantly inspiring to many of you as it has been to me. (URL) building! Miguel Agullo (URL) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | Re: Single acting pneumatics with spring return
|
|
(...) True, but there is one notable difference, as others have pointed out before: When compressiong air, the pressure difference is limited only by implementation details. The pressure inside the tank usually is not just slightly higher than (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) They are, but not for the reasons you state. (...) But LDraw *does* create LEGO models. Whether a model's physical parameters are stored in ABS molecules or mathematical data is irrelevant. Either method is an equally valid representation of (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) He's alive! All this time I've been mis-pronouncing "loog-net" over and over in my head, just to flush him out. All we had to do was use his name in vain! KL P.S. just kidding about the "loog-net" thing :) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|