 | | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) For the record, I agree with the word ownership sentiment. I did not at any point in time imply a word ownership in any legal sense. I simply made a polite request of someone and explained why I was making that reqest. Tobbe happened to accept (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
A few others to add to the list: ToadAuto.com MOTM: (URL) Model Building Mania MOTM: (URL) Car List Best MOTM: (URL) Model of the Month: (URL) Hobby Model of the Month Club: (URL) there is Joe Lauher's Construction Toy Homepage which has a MOTM (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Too much crane?
|
|
(...) Uhhh...hhh....... As usual with your models, I thought the first shot was the actual crane, until I clicked on it to see the close-up details. And it's radio-controlled too???? Yikes. Excellent work, as always... --Bill. (I added (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) Larry may not be sure what it implies but I think I know what it implies to me... To me it implies that anyone trying to trademark a name as generic as "Model of the Month" is being silly at best. What if Fashion Magazine decided to start a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) FWIW, Model Railroader(tm) had a "Model of the Month" for many years, may still do for all I know (I'm no longer a subscriber). Not sure what that implies, just thought I'd throw it out as a perhaps useful bit of info. (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) well, here's my 2 cents: 1) no one can own words. An artist (I forget her name) presented Charles Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities IN ITS ENTIRETY, to make precisely that point. In the ensuing court battles, she won. (no joke) 2) Model of the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Too much crane?
|
|
(...) A real treat to the model-team and technic heads alike. As others, I cannot wait to read the write-up on your website. In all the pictures posted, one question is nagging me - what are the pieces that you are using for the mirror "arm" (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: RT16 Radio Telescope
|
|
Simon, Thanks for the feedback. I agree, more white and grey would be an improvement. Actually, I do have the parts, but admit, I am not real good with color coordination. However, I like the Lego blue with the black. Typically, I like yellow and (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: RT16 Radio Telescope
|
|
(...) I love this model. I'm a sucker for anything technic that isn't a vehicle as I think it has a tendency to be used only for that. This is an excellent subject for a MOC and an excellently realised model. I particularly like the fact you have (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Too much crane?
|
|
(...) You are correct. I have found some wonderful pieces in my daughter's LEGO kits that work well in some of my robotics creations. Never limit yourself to only technic kits. If you do you will severly limit your ability to add the fine detail (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
