 | | Re: bridge
|
|
(...) If by negative you mean people didn't really think the idea would go over too well, then I agree. If you mean the tone of the responses was negative, then I'd hafta say you ought to go and read some other threads if you really want to see what (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | bridge
|
|
Wow, what a negative response to my post about the new section. I was mostly testing to see if my first post would work and couldn't think of anything to say. Oh well, life goes on :) I was thinking of starting a bridge but I really have no clue (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New piece?
|
|
Hello Duq "Duq" <duq@iegateway.net> schreef in bericht news:Gnw1tq.KCx@lugnet.com... (...) Yes, I have seen it in some bionicles and I may be wrong here, but I believe I also have seen it in 8465, the new buggy... greetings Maico Arts (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Joining Beams Axially at 90 deg
|
|
(...) I realize this and I agree with him. That's why I created that little webpage. It will be a good reference for me in the future whenever I start spouting out these technical descriptions of things. (...) Thanks! It will be a long while before (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Joining Beams Axially at 90 deg
|
|
(...) I think I'm with Steve on this, having had no mechanical engineering education tends to mean I know what things are, just not what to call them :-) That's a nice tractor BTW TJ, I'm looking forward to seeing more photos of that (and your (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New piece?
|
|
(...) I found it on Technica, part 32530: (URL) comes in set 5222- Chassis Pack, according to Technica. It could come in others, though. Technica only lists one or two sets that a part comes in, so the given set list isn't complete. TJ (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | New piece?
|
|
Reading a post about the Ewok set I came across this part: (URL) this been used in any Technic sets? It seems a pretty usefull part to me.... Duq (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Joining Beams Axially at 90 deg
|
|
(...) You're right! I don't know what "axial strenght" is either. But I do know what "axial strength" is ;-) There are two ways to load a member axially: tension and compression (i.e. pulling and squashing). I had been talking about axial tension, (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Joining Beams Axially at 90 deg
|
|
(...) Well my further education centered on computing, not the mechanical science's, and I knew what torsion and bending we're before hand. I bet a lot of technic readers didn't know what axial strenght was either. Steve (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Joining Beams Axially at 90 deg
|
|
(...) I've put together a little information on basic engineering terms: (URL) is the stuff you learn in a statics course, as Bram noted. TJ (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
