 | | Re: CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP?
|
|
(...) I just thought it was a "crappy " title for the article. <g> (...) Actually the article seems to state that the line is cancelled AND that it will contine in some way. (...) The kiddies? Matt (BTW, those exclamation points were included as (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Maybe I can sue LEGO over the Jack Stone line, since the name is obviously borrowed from the Anglo-Saxon "ethnic culture" of which I am a member. I am sick and tired of LEGO's piracy of Anglo-Saxon intellectual property. I mean, where elso did (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Bohrok!
|
|
D'oh... all 6 new names are cutesy abbreviations of the Toa names. Gali = Gahlok and so on. Dohlok? (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Bohrok Speculation
|
|
From the pictures, it looks like the head is a clear canopy with coloured printing, and maybe an LOM Martian inside (or at least something coloured showing through that looks like an LOM Martian head)? Martin (Not Martian) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP?
|
|
(...) The article is not authoritative. Consider just the internal inconsistency of the headline: Lego Halt Use of Some Names with the content. It's not at all clear what is going to be changed _except_ the names of the sets. To which, I gotta say, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
