 | | Re: What's the name of the little brother of big 24x43 technic wheel? (25x??)
|
|
(...) Oh! I thought number referred to the tyre in LDU's, but you're right, it's the dimensions of the hub in cm. And with the correct setnumber, I can finally locate it in the setdatabase and get it's statistics and number of parts - thanks! (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: ideas and a little help
|
|
(...) OK so I got it wrong - this will not work. Man I shouldn't post before breakfast. Opening an individual switch will always expand both pistons, you'd need a isolation switches on each individual line (which could be ganged together). ROSCO (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: ideas and a little help
|
|
(...) Re: (URL) Vineet, yes a system like that would work. You just have to be careful to not have master set to "expand" and individual switch set to "contract" you will lose pressure very quickly :( You should include a link to your Brickshelf (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Gottwald AK850 reach 5.20 meters!
|
|
(...) You are right Vineet, long booms do allow for some bending. But that is not restricted to LEGO, the boom on (URL) this monster> sags noticably in the middle. However most of that is due to "play" in the pin joints between the boom sections. (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: DEMAG AC500 in progress
|
|
Thank you very mutch,coming soon with new photos Bye Fabione "vineethonkan" <vineethonkan@yahoo.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:I1IK09.H28@lugnet.com... (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the name of the little brother of big 24x43 technic wheel? (25x??)
|
|
Hello Niels (...) I believe you are refering to 8849: (URL) I was just wondering if somebody could take a look at the tyre and tell me the (...) versions, (...) Front tyre says 20 x 30, the size of the hub it is. Diameter of the tyre is aprox. 6 cm. (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Gottwald AK850 reach 5.20 meters!
|
|
(...) Hi Alfred, I hope you got your jaw back in place again:-) About the load, it is not cabable of lifting that much, because of the poor stability in that height, Im just glad I had it setup outside in full height and got some nice pictures of (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
|
| |
| | ideas and a little help
|
|
All right guys, as I said earlier I'd be making a control for the pneumatics on my crane. I have just posted up some rough sketches, and I'd like to know if this drawing is possible. (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Gottwald AK850 reach 5.20 meters!
|
|
Very nice model! And good height too! I'd have thought an arm that high would be a bit weak, since it would probably allow for some bending. (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Gottwald AK850 reach 5.20 meters!
|
|
(...) snip (...) Holy crap! My jaw dropped out when I went to your site. This thing is huge! Great work! Now lets see you load it up... :) -Alfred (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
|
