| | Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" Rick Hallman
| | | (...) That stinks. We need a ... minifig scale ATAT. with 2 pilots, 10 ST, and an officer (Veers). (...) Very weak. (...) Dear Lego....Get the clue. We don't want watto! We want..err..Stormtroopers!! (...) God I hope not... Rick (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" Thomas Weigle
| | | | | (...) What would you be willing to pay for that 13 minifig set, which should be roughly twice the size of the Falcon in order not to piss people off because of lacking scale etc? With a little luck, we'll get an AT-AT with some minifigs. And I'm (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" Andrew Tyrone
| | | | | (...) Actually, I want Watto, just in a lower cost set. >:o -- Andrew, Agent 0007 (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |