Subject:
|
Re: UCS in the future
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:08:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
seilert@freenet.!spamcake!de
|
Viewed:
|
401 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi!
Bryan Wong schrieb:
<snip>
> Hmm, I think the ships that "are too large" could be possible UCS models
> because they aren't TOO large. They're mostly single-seater (or maybe double)
> ships so they should be comparable to the existing UCS sets. Then again, I
> don't know how the B or Y-Wing (for example) compare in scale to the existing
> UCS sets.
> Personally, I was hoping for a UCS Millenium Falcon, but THAT would probably
> be too large!
> Bryan
Hmm, maybe TLC will not use the same scale for all UCS models -
Personally I would like it since it would give TLC the opportunity to
produce cool ships like the Nebulon B Frigate or a Star Destroyer.
CU,
Stefan
--
Stefan Eilert -> seilert@uos.de
AWKWARD Software -> http://awkward.hypermart.net
--
Quotomat says: "Thousands of innocent people die every day. Detonate one
rich guy's dog, and you're a marked man for life."
(John Cusack as Martin Blank in 'Grosse Pointe Blank', 1997)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: UCS in the future
|
| (...) Hmm, I think the ships that "are too large" could be possible UCS models because they aren't TOO large. They're mostly single-seater (or maybe double) ships so they should be comparable to the existing UCS sets. Then again, I don't know how (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
