Subject:
|
Re: UCS in the future
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 08:30:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
485 times
|
| |
|
|
> Hmm, I think the ships that "are too large" could be possible UCS models
> because they aren't TOO large. They're mostly single-seater (or maybe double)
> ships so they should be comparable to the existing UCS sets. Then again, I
> don't know how the B or Y-Wing (for example) compare in scale to the existing
> UCS sets.
The Y-Wing & B-Wing Fighters are something like 16-17 meters (the X-Wing,
in comparison, is 12,5 m). Slave 1 is around 20 meters...
> Personally, I was hoping for a UCS Millenium Falcon, but THAT would probably
> be too large!
Since the minifig version comes in at $100, it would probably be a bit
large, yes. :-)
T.
--> thomas weigle | w.i.m.p.
web: http://www.ya-ba.net/
------------------------------>
.iMMersE your soUL in LOVE.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: UCS in the future
|
| (...) Hmm, I think the ships that "are too large" could be possible UCS models because they aren't TOO large. They're mostly single-seater (or maybe double) ships so they should be comparable to the existing UCS sets. Then again, I don't know how (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
