 | | Re: Who's got the Y-wing? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) There aren't any studs. It's just a long cross-axle. Steve (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Who's got the Y-wing? —Ben Vaughan
|
| | | | (...) I think you might misunderstand. The way I read John's post was: "When laid on a plate, how many studs would be covered by this piece? Ala the technic instructions that show an axle in relation to a brick to demonstrate the size. ===...=== 6 | (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who's got the Y-wing? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I might have, or I might have understood exactly what I was doing. Sort of like right now. Steve (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who's got the Y-wing? —Ben Vaughan
|
| | | | (...) Well goodness, my apologies then. Ben. (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who's got the Y-wing? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) OK. Sorry if I was curt, terse, or too vague. I occasionally misjudge what messages need smileys, and in which the intent is clear without the help. John has been going on about wanting to find out the length of the extension rods in the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who's got the Y-wing? —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | (...) And if a less-familiar name was attached to the post, it probably would have worked, too. I was just about to hit the "reply" button when I saw it was you. And about "going on" about the length, I guess I figured that if someone had posted a (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who's got the Y-wing? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) That makes sense. (...) I just double-checked. The axle-links are still the same length as a 16L beam. They do stick out, but those 3x3x2 cones on the back of the nacelles help balance things out a bit. Steve (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
