Subject:
|
Re: CHEWIE & C-3PO REVEALED!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Feb 2000 07:48:37 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
sgore@superonline.#Spamless#com
|
Viewed:
|
1552 times
|
| |
|
|
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
>
> Kevin Loch wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.starwars, Kevin Knoot writes:
> > > A gold-plated 3PO would be cool. Perhaps they made him out of a gold-colored
> > > plastic instead was so they could print on his front AND back. Are there
> > other
> >
> > real gold plating would be very expensive. The "silver" bricks are
> > aluminum coated. Is there a gold substitute? If they used
> > copper they would have to coat it too (and it might not be safe,
> > since the coating could be chewed off).
> >
> > KL
>
> They should use what ever coating they used on the bugle and gold coin parts.
>
> --
> Jonathan Wilson
Coating is evil. It can be chipped off very easily. I can't think of a coated minifig with all the articulation. The
method that they used to make 8448 (and some other 1999 technic car) hubs could be much better (looking worse than
coating, I admit).
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: CHEWIE & C-3PO REVEALED!!!
|
| (...) could be much better (looking worse than (...) I agree. I always liked toys that were made of "silvered" plastic, that is, flecks of glitter mixed into the plastic (like the new 3PO) rather than chromed as a coating. It ALWAYS wears off and (...) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
