 | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —Gene C. Weissinger
|
| | | This is probably due to the amount of money LEGO agreed to pay for the rights to even use the Star Wars paraphernalia. Wasn't it rumored to be around $50 million? I may be grossly out of whack here (over or under) ??? EC (25 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —Charles Spindell
|
| | | | (...) That is why I have absolutely no idea why TLG is only releasing around 8-10 sets every year. I have a ton of money to spend, but I can only buy so many Naboo Fighters and X-Wings. If TLG put out more sets, including mini-fig packs and play (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —Arnold Staniczek
|
| | | | (...) Does Lego think all those a-, b-, x- and y-wings should fight against Darth Vader's Tie only?? This is such a poor job, unbelievably! Give us regular tie fighters, interceptors, tie bombers, shuttles, all equipped with pilots, and storm (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —Gene C. Weissinger
|
| | | | | Maybe this should be a Lugnet.dear-lego topic? Think they will listen? EC (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, no kidding. Especially when you have to pay $50-$60 to get the set with DV's TIE. I think it would be great if they released a set where you could build either a TIE or TIE Interceptor. But I suppose it'd keep profits up if they were (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
