Subject:
|
Re: The Lego Group
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Sat, 29 Jan 2000 11:15:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1910 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Richard Franks writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Charles Spindell writes:
> > I have seen a number of folks here continuing to use the acronym, TLC, • instead
> > of TLG. It is driving me crazy
>
> :) Here's some history
> <http://www.lugnet.com/publish/?n=1132>
> <http://www.lugnet.com/publish/?n=1149>
Those where posted in november, yet the lego site front page has "the Lego
Group (c) 2000" at the bottom. Of course TLG/TLC/LEGO have made slip ups in
published material before.
> > So please, have some respect in future postings. It is TLG. TLC is a Grammy
> > winning hip-hop group, as well as a cable television channel.
>
> Yep - you're right - maybe LEGO should be used instead of TLC, it'll take a
> while to change it though (re: the losing LEGO vs legos battle!). But all the
> people who care about it can do is use the correct form, and hope that it
> looks neat enough to copy!
I agree too; TLC is annoying (there's too many other meanings). If we can't use
TLG then LEGO would be a better alternative.
Regards,
Steve Hodge
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Lego Group
|
| (...) :) Here's some history (2 URLs) (...) Yep - you're right - maybe LEGO should be used instead of TLC, it'll take a while to change it though (re: the losing LEGO vs legos battle!). But all the people who care about it can do is use the correct (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
