| |
In lugnet.general, Tony Priestman writes:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, Eugwe Coral (<FMzyEJ.HoG@lugnet.com>) wrote at
> 16:41:34
>
> > I
> > just wanted to put one lonely comment of 'I am impressed and pleased' out
> > there so that anyone like myself (looking for good marks) can hear someone
> > else praising the lineup.
>
> I also think the B-wing is great, although I'm not sure about the A-
> wing: shouldn't it be a bit bigger than a speeder?
Yup, see this thread:
< http://www.lugnet.com/starwars/?n=4043 > (read the *entire* thing to get the
whole picture)
The A-Wing is about 5 studs too short and the B-Wing is about 10 studs too
short.
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2000 sets
|
| (...) What is the scale based on? Height or Width of a minifig? Minifigs clearly don't have human proportions, so you'll get drastically different numbers depending on which you use. (in some cases, width may be the more limiting factor, such as in (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2000 sets
|
| On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, Eugwe Coral (<FMzyEJ.HoG@lugnet.com>) wrote at 16:41:34 (...) I too am impressed with the SW sets. They conform to the LEGO view of the universe, being smaller and simpler than the real thing, (six wide trains? I mean, come on (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
