Subject:
|
Re: 2000 sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 18:49:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
389 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, Eugwe Coral (<FMzyEJ.HoG@lugnet.com>) wrote at
16:41:34
> I
> just wanted to put one lonely comment of 'I am impressed and pleased' out
> there so that anyone like myself (looking for good marks) can hear someone
> else praising the lineup.
I too am impressed with the SW sets.
They conform to the LEGO view of the universe, being smaller and simpler
than the real thing, (six wide trains? I mean, come on :-), but they
retain the essence of the originals.
I also think the B-wing is great, although I'm not sure about the A-
wing: shouldn't it be a bit bigger than a speeder?
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2000 sets
|
| (...) Yup, see this thread: < (URL) > (read the *entire* thing to get the whole picture) The A-Wing is about 5 studs too short and the B-Wing is about 10 studs too short. Jeff (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | 2000 sets
|
| I have hear a lot of talk about how much dislike there is towards the 2000 line of LEGO. I just wanted to put my two cents in. I now have the Technic Pit Droid, The Flash Speeder, The Desert Skiff, and The B-wing. I think that the B-wing is one of (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
