 | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | (...) From LC's point of view, the MF is probably like a gem which is supposed to "sell" more Star Wars sets. I mean, this is, like, everybody's favourite Star Wars vehicle. It's probably going to include Luke, Han Solo and Princess Leia (this is (...) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —John VanZwieten
| | | | | | Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:m366z2w5yq.fsf@....uio.no... (...) A gem is what it should have been--and an expensive gem. The MF should be the SW answer to the Supercar, _the_ model for "wowing" people. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | | | | (...) I agree with that. However, it looks like they chose the Tie Fighter and the X-Wing instead for the "wow" effect. (I'm refering to the "collector's items, new for 2000.) No wonder, really, as the Tie Fighter and the X-Wing are much more (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Jonathan Wilson
| | | | | (...) And an R2 unit, no chewie, no lando, no 3po and if they want another minifig to flesh it out then another obi wan or something. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |
