 | | Re: Odd taxonomy question —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) I dunno. I always throw those little monkeys in with the minifigs... (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Odd taxonomy question —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) For clarity: not that droids are little monkeys. Just that they're similar in their not-quite-minifigness. (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Odd taxonomy question —Jesse Long
|
| | | | | Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) Monkeys have been called pseudo-figs or quasi-figs by some, since they're more than just one-piece animals but less than mini-figs. Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Odd taxonomy question —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) But did they evolve, or were they specially created? Steve (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Odd taxonomy question —Jim Baker
|
| | | | Also sprach Matthew Miller: : For clarity: not that droids are little monkeys. Just that they're similar : in their not-quite-minifigness. quasi-figs, then ... posable figures that are not minifigs ... horses, R2, the monkeys all qualify ... but the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
