 | | Re: New Pictures of 2000 SW sets —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | (...) Hmm... I'm kinda dissapointed, overall. Let's look at each one individually. Pices in perenthesis are my estimates. 7134 A-Wing($19.99): Bad - Too Small, the use of blue and dark gray screws up a nice color scheme, canopy that tilts up, chunky (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Pictures of 2000 SW sets —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) Oops, forgot to mention why I was disappointed overall. It is because of the three big sets I was looking forward to, two are very poor renditions. The only one I really like as a set is the Slave 1. The little sets just don't make up for it. (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | RE: New Pictures of 2000 SW sets —Jesper Kjaer
|
| | | | 7134 A-Wing Actually the size is correct - counting studs and compareing it to the 9.6 meters of the 'full' size A-Wing that's one of the only new sets they managed to get right :) Dark grey and blue bricks I don't get that either - I would REALLY (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
