 | | Re: Reply to "New Star Wars LEGO" —Kya Morden
| | | | On Mon, 4 Oct 1999 00:30:47 GMT, "jamie hickey" <jamie1123@webtv.net> wrote: They did say (...) You mean I'll have to buy 10 more sets just to return my Classic Star Wars subtheme back to "Complete" status? (Yes, I view the Classic sets as a (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | RE: Reply to "New Star Wars LEGO" —Ben Gatrelle
| | | | | (...) I agree. after all EP1 has a different logo, and no duplicated minifigs. Isn't that the distinction, after all? Ben Gatrelle PS don't look at the Adventurers' logo(s), and don't start the "is R2-D2 a minifig" discussion back up again! :-P (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Reply to "New Star Wars LEGO" —Kya Morden
| | | | | (...) Exactly ^_^ (...) Adventurers have logos? (While I have a few adventurers sets, I only have them for the pieces, plan to make a museum one of these days.) As for R2, it's not human. ^_^ Kya (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Reply to "New Star Wars LEGO" —Jason M. Normand
| | | | | oh but jar-jar is? :o) (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |
