| | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
| (...) Right. But I had been thinking that "Lightsaber Duel" would have to be about *the* lightsaber duel on Naboo, not the minor skirmish on Tattoine. Hence my confusion. Steve (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
| On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:33:57 GMT, Steve Bliss uttered the following profundities... (...) Would have been better. No need to buy a sub to get OB1! Plus it might have had some (though few) good architectural parts. (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
| (...) Yeah, but were it the Naboo confrontation, wouldn't it have to be called a "triel" (or a "tercel" if you prefer) and not a duel? Duel, to me, implies two. I did find it weird that they chose the Tatooine confrontation, but I welcome the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
| Now with added spoilers! (just scroll down, Gentle Reader) (...) *Sigh*. Yes, you're right. If there were some way to determine the result, I would bet money that TLG would still call a Naboo-confrontation set a "duel". Maybe they didn't want to do (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |