Subject:
|
Re: Thats no moon!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:19:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2823 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.starwars, Simon Maxwell wrote:
> In lugnet.starwars, David VinZant wrote:
> > I would have figured someone would have posted about this.
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1112540
> >
> > For scale
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1112305
> >
> > Enjoy
> >
> > Dave
>
> It's a shame that LEGO goofed and made the Death Star and mini Executor at two
> different scales. The second Death Star is not 160 km in diameter, as the
> model's label states. It is in fact about 900 km in diameter.
Simon, why do you think that Death Star II is 900 km in diameter?
Please check out:
http://www.starwars.com/databank/location/deathstarii/index.html
It clearly states that it is in fact 160 km in diameter.
The first Death Star was 120 km.:
http://www.starwars.com/databank/location/deathstar/
...or am I wrong?
If I am right the scale is not all bad. If it should have been better the
Executor should have been one stud shorter. And then it would be difficult to
build as a recognizable model. (On the other hand the Death could have been 12
knobs wider.)
The Dann
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Thats no moon!!!
|
| (...) According to the Dorling Kindersley books 'Star Wars Incredible Cross-sections' and 'Inside the Worlds of Star Wars', the first and second Death Stars are 160 km and 900 km in diameter respectively. See also the Star Wars Technical (...) (19 years ago, 15-Mar-05, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Thats no moon!!!
|
| (...) It's a shame that LEGO goofed and made the Death Star and mini Executor at two different scales. The second Death Star is not 160 km in diameter, as the model's label states. It is in fact about 900 km in diameter. (19 years ago, 20-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars)
|
16 Messages in This Thread: ![Thats no moon!!! -David VinZant (20-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -Larry Pieniazek (20-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -Kyle D. Jackson (20-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -John Cooper (20-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -Mark Chittenden (23-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -James Wilson (23-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -Simon Maxwell (20-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -Erik Olson (21-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -James Wilson (23-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -Steve Lane (23-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -Kyle D. Jackson (25-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -David Eaton (23-Feb-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -Simon Maxwell (15-Mar-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -Dann Madsen (16-Mar-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Thats no moon!!! -John Gerlach (19-Mar-05 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|