 | | Re: AT-TE Assembled Pics —Mark Neumann
|
| | | Hey, what's the stiffness like on those new ball sockets? Are they stronger or weaker than the existing technic ball and sockets? Us mech(a) folks are dying to know! Those legs look like new hinge bits too. Is that the case? Mark (...) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: AT-TE Assembled Pics —Amado C. Pinlac
|
| | | | | Not having any of the Technic ball and sockets that you mentioned, could not compare their strength thereof. The ball is actually in two halves and has changed from the boxed pic to the actual one that has four depressions for studs. The connectors (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: AT-TE Assembled Pics —Joe Meno
|
| | | | (...) I don't have the AT-TE set (yet) but you can get 2 of the the ball joints in the Geonosian Fighter set...they are pretty sturdy, and have a bit more resistance than the technic ball and sockets. The attachment point on the ball is relatively (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: AT-TE Assembled Pics —Mark Neumann
|
| | | | Thanks Joe! Attaching this to mecha group for those interested. I think we'll be putting these to good use. Mark (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | |
