Subject:
|
Re: AT-TE Assembled Pics
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 01:52:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
552 times
|
| |
|
|
Not having any of the Technic ball and sockets that you mentioned, could not
compare their strength thereof. The ball is actually in two halves and has
changed from the boxed pic to the actual one that has four depressions for
studs.
The connectors of the legs to the body looks like they're straight 1x3
liftarm with the round coupling hinge at the end. Don't remember any part
like this. Hope that helps.
Regards,
ACPin & Sons
In lugnet.starwars, Mark Neumann writes:
> Hey, what's the stiffness like on those new ball sockets? Are they stronger
> or weaker than the existing technic ball and sockets? Us mech(a) folks are
> dying to know!
> Those legs look like new hinge bits too. Is that the case?
>
> Mark
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: AT-TE Assembled Pics
|
| Hey, what's the stiffness like on those new ball sockets? Are they stronger or weaker than the existing technic ball and sockets? Us mech(a) folks are dying to know! Those legs look like new hinge bits too. Is that the case? Mark (...) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
