 | | Re: The Lowdown on 2003 @ WAL* MART —Erik Olson
|
| | | Tony, it's a bad idea to leak this stuff. Sure it may be old news . But your computer at work is not a public information system. You don't want to be made into an example for treating it like one. See (URL) what happened with Target in 2001. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Lowdown on 2003 @ WAL* MART —Tony Knaak
|
| | | | | OOO...OOOH! Oh man! That's not good. I hope I don't get in trouble. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Lowdown on 2003 @ WAL* MART —Mark Mueller
|
| | | | I don't think they can really call it a leak, I just bought Jabba's Palace this weekend at Wal*Mart. (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Lowdown on 2003 @ WAL* MART —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | (...) It wasn't the giving out the information of the availability of certain sets that was the problem, but the sharing of information on certain quantities. The public DOES NOT have right to know how many sets a certain retailer has, whether it is (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
