Subject:
|
Re: Death Star Size Comparison Chart
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 05:02:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
723 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Leonard Hoffman writes:
> somehow i think there's a problem here.
>
> in another thread this info is given:
> "Super Star Destroyer: 12,800 Meters
> Death Star 1: 120,000 Meters in Diameter
> Death Star 2: 160,000 Meters in Diameter"
>
> that would make DS2 slightly larger than DS1, not something like 100x bigger!!
> also i remember ROTJ, the scene where the SSD crashes into the DS2, the ssd is
> much larger than a EDBD sliver..
>
> however if you are saying that there is such a difference based off of "on
> screen evidence" then i'd like to see how you reached those conclusions, and
> what figures you're working with.
Taken from the summary of the "Dimensions" section of this page. (about 1/3 of
the way down the page)
http://www.theforce.net/swtc/ds.html
"The presently-available evidence indicates that the diameter of the first
Death Star is in the range 160 - 165km, although the purely canonical evidence
cannot strictly rule out a smaller figure close to the commonly published 120km
value. The diameter of the Death Star II is in the range 800km - 960km. Thus
the roleplaying game estimate for the size of the first Death Star is not far
from the truth but the second battle station has been grossly underestimated."
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Death Star Size Comparison Chart
|
| somehow i think there's a problem here. in another thread this info is given: "Super Star Destroyer: 12,800 Meters Death Star 1: 120,000 Meters in Diameter Death Star 2: 160,000 Meters in Diameter" that would make DS2 slightly larger than DS1, not (...) (22 years ago, 18-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
