Subject:
|
Re: Death Star Size Comparison Chart
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 04:14:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
449 times
|
| |
|
|
somehow i think there's a problem here.
in another thread this info is given:
"Super Star Destroyer: 12,800 Meters
Death Star 1: 120,000 Meters in Diameter
Death Star 2: 160,000 Meters in Diameter"
that would make DS2 slightly larger than DS1, not something like 100x bigger!!
also i remember ROTJ, the scene where the SSD crashes into the DS2, the ssd is
much larger than a EDBD sliver..
however if you are saying that there is such a difference based off of "on
screen evidence" then i'd like to see how you reached those conclusions, and
what figures you're working with.
-lenny
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> Using all the 'on screen evidence' here is a size comparison of both Death
> Stars in relation to the Super Stardestroyer.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/lordinsanity/Nano-Scale/z_deathstars.gif
>
> -Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Death Star Size Comparison Chart
|
| (...) Taken from the summary of the "Dimensions" section of this page. (about 1/3 of the way down the page) (URL) presently-available evidence indicates that the diameter of the first Death Star is in the range 160 - 165km, although the purely (...) (22 years ago, 18-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
