 | | Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Jeff Jardine
|
| | | (...) Maybe this A-wing would be closer to scale: (URL) J (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) Uh... isn't that piece larger than the 'X-Wing' piece I used? As to why I made them same size... well that is why I put the 'X-Wing' on a 45 degree angle to make it longer. None of the other parts really fit and they are close enough when (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Bob Parker
|
| | | | | In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes: snipped (...) And that's a Good Thing(TM)!!! - I just left out the ;-) - Bob (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Jeff Jardine
|
| | | | (...) This is serious business.(1) Have a look at this: (URL) Flexible End 1 x 1 x 2/3 without Tabs" has a weight of 0.103g "Plate 1 x 1" has a weight of 0.176g The dimensions of a 1x1 plate are appx 8mm x 8mm x 5mm If you turn it diagonally, the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) But it will also be twice as 'fat' as the X-wing. :-) A little too long or a little too wide. Hmmmm. Decisions, decisions. (...) -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
