To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 14049
    Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Jeff Jardine
   (...) Maybe this A-wing would be closer to scale: (URL) J (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
   
        Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Mike Petrucelli
   (...) Uh... isn't that piece larger than the 'X-Wing' piece I used? As to why I made them same size... well that is why I put the 'X-Wing' on a 45 degree angle to make it longer. None of the other parts really fit and they are close enough when (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
   
        Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Bob Parker
     In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes: snipped (...) And that's a Good Thing(TM)!!! - I just left out the ;-) - Bob (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
   
        Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Jeff Jardine
   (...) This is serious business.(1) Have a look at this: (URL) Flexible End 1 x 1 x 2/3 without Tabs" has a weight of 0.103g "Plate 1 x 1" has a weight of 0.176g The dimensions of a 1x1 plate are appx 8mm x 8mm x 5mm If you turn it diagonally, the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
   
        Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle! —Mike Petrucelli
   (...) But it will also be twice as 'fat' as the X-wing. :-) A little too long or a little too wide. Hmmmm. Decisions, decisions. (...) -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR