 | | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
|
(...) On FBTB they said a few months ago that the ewoks are shorter then other figs In one of the pics of the new HP sets it shows some shorter people. So I think that the ewoks are shorter. But who knows --Kevin W. § (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
|
(...) I know. Yes the Ewoks and the goblins from Gringott's bank are described as mini-minifigs. And Hagrid (the big brown guy) is significantly larger than a human or Chewbacca. Chewie was a head or two taller than Han right? Hagid is 9 1/2 or 10 (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
|
Wow. I didn't realize the ewoks were smaller. They look the same size as the rest of em. Veddy cool. I'm not into the potter stuff but of course I had to get em all. Fluffy is quite nifty. Its frustrating to see info about sets float around but not (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
|
No Sandcrawler or Deathstar - looks like the major additions to the Star Wars line will be the top end (price wise) Rebel Blockade Runner, with mostly 'mini(figs)' sets added. (...) same size as (...) course I (...) sets are more (...) was made for (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
