 | | Re: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter —Mark Sandlin
| | | | (...) Hi Bruce, Looks like you've captured the shape fairly well. Is that UCS scale? It seems like it's lacking something... maybe a few opening panels with some hoses and stuff underneath? Still, a nice reproduction. :^) ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 15-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter —A. Mark Wilburn
| | | | | (...) Muffin Head, believe it or not, if you consider 1 stud = 1 ft as minifig scale, then this is minifig scale (the 'official' length of 9.6 m would become 31.5 studs, or 32 as he's done here). Yeah, I know Mark, you eyeball what you think looks (...) (23 years ago, 15-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Scale (Was: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter) —Mark Sandlin
| | | | | (...) I do this mainly because of the fact that minifigs have no scale. If you consider 1 stud = 1 foot, then your minifigs are only about 5 feet tall, which is well under average height for a human. But if you decide that a minifig is 6 feet tall, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Scale (Was: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter) —A. Mark Wilburn
| | | | | In lugnet.starwars, Mark Sandlin writes: ... (...) ... Right, so now I try to scale based on other things (e.g a sitting minifig, is around 1/35th scale but with super short legs... but if he's to be sitting, I scale it to his sitting height). And (...) (23 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |
