 | | Re: Ewok Holocaust —Eric Joslin
|
| | | (...) This is of course a problem. But it's something that can be ignored for humour's sake. (...) ??? Actually, carefully reading the article shows that he addresses the point of debris vs. vapor- first, vaporisation doesn't get rid of the matter, (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Ewok Holocaust —Jeromy Irvine
|
| | | | (...) the (...) matter, (...) several (...) it end up (...) Whether (...) the (...) a (...) high in the (...) atmosphere. True. Even if vaporized, the matter still has to go somewhere. My point (which I failed to clearly identify, apologies for (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ewok Holocaust —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) The point is that the matter is matter. It doesn't just disappear, it has to go somewhere. If it is part of an object which is in an artificial orbit around the planet, it will fall to the planet (unless it actually has more energy than (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ewok Holocaust —Will Lutz
|
| | | | The Earth gets hits by tons and tons of dust all the time yet it doesn't seem to bother her none :) Yep, that's right we are gaining weight all the time... of coarse the last correction of the gravitation constant knocked some 6,000,000,000,000 (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ewok Holocaust —Bryan Hodges
|
| | | | | (...) Not only dust but our planet is constantly barraged by meteors and space junk. Most of the stuff burns up in the atmosphere without any detrimental effects, the stuff that does hit the Earth is typically so small that it causes very little (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Ewok Holocaust —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | (...) True, but the Death Star blew up over a small area, so a tightly concentrated area of vaporized Death Star might be a bit different in effect. IANAS (I Am Not A Scientist) so I can't say for certain. (...) True, but the DS wouldn't be anywhere (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ewok Holocaust —James Simpson
|
| | | | (...) But the question is whether or not the explosion would hurt the Ewoks. No doubt all of that cosmic dust over centuries is beneficial to the Earth...it adds to soil fertility and the nutrient balance of the oceans. From a geologic/ (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ewok Holocaust —Will Lutz
|
| | | | (...) I don't think it would... first the orbit of such a space station would be several 1,000's of miles from the moon/planet. You would do this so that the gravitational effects of the planet/moon would not hurt your station and you could keep it (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
