To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *9003 (-5)
  Re: Cloud City
 
(...) They also made the "Rebel Transport" from ESB (The ones they use to escape from Hoth). It wasn't a playset, it was the complete ship. Basically, you could stand all your action figures in it. It was completely out of scale. Kev Z #142 (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Cloud City
 
(...) True, but it was also horribly, horribly out of scale. Still, *lots* of the Hasbro ships etc were subject to "selective compression". The X-wing was a bit stout around the middle and had short wings. The Millenium Falcon was pretty grossly (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Cloud City
 
(...) They made a playset with some of the features of the Executor, and there was, of course, the Death Star Playset, but those were the only ones that were compatible with the 3.5" figs. I've seen pictures of a prototype Tantive IV, but they never (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Cloud City
 
(...) But did not Kenner do some capital ships for their figures that were not to movie scale but still looked cool. Perhaps Lego could do the same. A small Minifig Blockade Runner would still look awesome if built right. Who cares about scale? A (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Cloud City
 
I seriously doubt they'll do a Star Destroyer, or the Mon Calimari Cruiser, or even a blockade runner, unless they do them as a UCS set. A proper mini-fig scale Star Destroyer would be quite large, and quite expensive. Basically it would require a (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR