|
|
 | | Re: Lambda Class Shuttle
|
| I must admit, however, that the wings on the Enfield model are very clean, and seamless. And it looks like there's a retracting landing gear that actually supports the model. Mine works but collapses under the weight. Gee, maybe mine isn't so good. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Lambda Class Shuttle
|
| I think the Enfield model sucks...yes, yes, it has the prominent features of the Imperial Shuttle, but it looks over-the-hill and bloated. A Nerf Shuttle! Way out of proportion and completely lacking in the sleek grace of the model from the movie. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 2001 SW line-up
|
| (...) on (...) (a.k.a. (...) Yes! I love Office Space! It seems so... relevant to where I work because I'm at a typically bloated company with too much middle-management who haven't enough to do. I don't care for gangsta rap myself, but I thought it (...) (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 2001 SW line-up
|
| (...) Heh... "but he said...when I spoke...yes, I understand but...Well, ok, but I'm going to blow up the death star." "Well, typically, I come in in the morning, and kinda zone out for a while" "Zone out?" "Yeah, it looks like I'm using the force, (...) (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Question on the Shuttle??
|
| Now that's disappointing. I just hate to see models created by using glue. I understand that they need to glue things to get them to stay together, but I object to the use of glue for making the model itself. :^( ~Mark (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
