|
|
 | | Re: 2001 SW line-up
|
| (...) "LIKE INCREASING YOUR SALARY MWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Wait, no that wasn't it... oh yeah maybe I'll choke you." -- Andrew, Agent 0007 (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 2001 SW line-up
|
| (...) Don't forget that there are a couple more Pod Racers to be made. I really wish that at least two more sets would be available for the E1-line - NOT the juniorized tub ones. Bye, Christian --- xTI@N. P.S.: Note that I usually reply slow... (...) (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 2001 SW line-up
|
| To All, (...) Sith (...) Hm... more like 20 seconds, but it still is a very small amount. (...) expensive (...) sabre. Well, I don't really think the Sith is *that* expensive ($29.99USD). I am frankly surprised by the inclusion of the double blade (...) (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 2001 SW line-up
|
| (...) Ah, but the Sith Infiltrator was an excuse to put Darth Maul in an expensive set, especially with it being the only source of a straight double light sabre. I see the shuttle/cruiser as a similar set, lots of plates, some good hinges, and a (...) (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 2001 SW line-up
|
| You bother about screen time? LEGO obviously does not. How long was the Sith Infiltrator's appearance in the movie? 6 seconds - at best ... Burkhard (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
