To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *7928 (-5)
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Aaron (and we, in general) aren't complaining in the hope that George will re-do anything; we're complaining because George didn't do it as well as he might have, given certain differences of aesthetic sensibility. (...) I've heard lots of (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Imperial Sets in 2001
 
(...) :-) (...) Good thinking on making the jawas. That should be cost effective for lego. Do I hear Ewoks too. Gerry (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A couple stupid SW questions...
 
(...) Uh... I ain't huffy... :) My mood remains as it has been. I'm fairly relaxed actually. (...) I didn't say that... again you're putting words in my mouth. I was merely stating that it's pointless to complain about things you can't change. Even (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Imperial Sets in 2001
 
The technique they used to make the baby dinosaur could be used to make jawas. They could make sand people also. I can always dream about a jawa transport with numerous 6x16 brown plates and wide technic tractor treads. :-) brian (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Imperial Sets in 2001
 
Hi, I think we are all in agreement that we will recieve several "Bad Guys" in the 2001 assortment from lego. Here is my two cents of what we will see. The first set ($5.99) will be a couple Stormtroopers with some kind of check point. Mabey even (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR