 | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November
|
|
(...) emotional (...) Heh. People seem to get really upset when you express an opinion about Star Wars that is skeptical or slightly negative. I love it too, but I'm also able to look at it objectively from time to time. Consider all the things that (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November
|
|
Ah, well, I don't have the Behind the Magic CD because Lucasarts has chosen to ignore the Mac platform. Thanks for the official source. That's all I wanted. ~Mark (...) vaguely (...) upset (...) on (...) just (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November
|
|
(...) $50? For two normal TIES? I would hate that, and I know they could do it for less. The TIE design definately needs inmproving, I really hated the way the Advanced was modeled. I don't need a TIE with a rediculous convolution of bricks and (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TLG and Minifig Scale
|
|
(...) ...Never even thought of a UCS naboo fighter, that would be cool! just think of the chrome and yellow plates they could put in it :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wamalug guy ((URL) Guide ((URL) the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November
|
|
(...) Two ships would probably make it a $50 set. Two regular TIEs would be awesome (I for one would love that set), but more likely it'd be a set with a TIE + TIE Interceptor/Bomber. Also, the mandatory hangar stuff. (...) Did you see my other (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
