 | | Re: *Star* Destroyer?
|
|
(...) They probably named it that because it sounds cool. I mean, which sounds better? "Oh no, theres a star destroyer headed right for us!" or "oh no, theres a ship destroyer headed right for us!". Hasta La Vista, Sean (22 years ago, 3-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: *Star* Destroyer?
|
|
No, it's just called a "Star Destroyer" for the same reason that the USS Enterprise is a "Starship". The Enterprise is a Ship designed to operate amongst the stars - likewise the SD is simply a military vessel operating in space. Andrew. "Mark (...) (22 years ago, 3-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: *Star* Destroyer?
|
|
(...) No, the Star Destroyer could never destroyer a star. in ANH Han made the comment that all the ships in the starfleet could not destroy a planet (being Aldeeran) I suspect it is called a "Star Destroyer" for the fearsome name. the Empire ruled (...) (22 years ago, 3-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Z-95 Headhunter
|
|
Hey All, I don't usually post here (I'm a .castle guy) but my cousin is a Star Wars MOC builder and he built this recently. He isn't a Lugnet member so I am posting this for him. Here is a link to the pics. (URL) and all comments are welcome, thanks (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | *Star* Destroyer?
|
|
Can the Imperial Star Destroyer really destroy stars? I mean, didn't it take something the size of the Death Star to destroy a mere planet? Maybe these would more aptly be named "Imperial Ship Destroyer" and "Death Planet"... Mark (energizing (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone ever tried to build this before?
|
|
(...) Well, I just mentioned it because I saw people build a TIE Fighter, a TIE Bomber, a TIE Interceptor, and one other kind of TIE with three wing pylons but I forgot the name of it and no one had ever built one on LUGNET before and I was (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0
|
|
(...) Your loss dude. I have to totally disagree with your perception of the "great AFOL community". See my post here: (URL) . I've seen lots of positives here, and have been glad to have this online community to share with and learn from. Much like (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0
|
|
(...) Did it occur to you that perhaps a lot of the people who read Lugnet also read FBTB and might reply there? I think that generally people don't post in both places. In any case, making a drama queen "woe is me, I'm leaving whilst slamming the (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0
|
|
"Guybrush" <REMOVECAPSguybrush@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:H4wMvF.AwM@lugnet.com... (...) section (...) For me, it's "OK, so I don't get any replys on LUGNET about a MOC. Let's see what's going on with the photos I put up on BrickShelf?" I (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0
|
|
Jon, I think he'd like your stuff better if you called them "customs." James (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
