|
| | Re: Ultimate Mini-fig scale X-Wing
|
| Thanks for the great comments guys! Looks like I was a little quick to show off, though...I changed it already <cowers>. I noticed the nose was too long so it's 4 studs shorter and looks much better. I'd put up pics of this one, but the shortened (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Lego starwars site
|
| No, to keep their site up-to-date. OK, I guess it could have been interpreted that way. Does anybody have an idea of the structure within TLG that handles the website? It's a safe guess that a team or department is responsible for the up-keep. I (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
| I think comparing the Star Wars LEGO Sets with the Harry Potter sets isn't really fair. The Star Wars sets have essentially all been vehicle sets, whereas with Potter, aside from the train, they are all playsets. Designing a LEGO playset and a LEGO (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Lego starwars site
|
| (...) To point out when they are wrong? <g> Jude (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Lego starwars site
|
| Stupid, isn't it? If TLG takes such an alleged interest in LUGNET, FBTB, etc...one would think they prefer to keep their own website current and, therefore, "competitive." I go straight to LUGNET and FBTB for the latest. Shame on TLG for abandoning (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| |