Subject:
|
Re: Lego starwars site
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:39:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
362 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Matt Sekerak writes:
> Stupid, isn't it? If TLG takes such an alleged interest in LUGNET, FBTB,
> etc...one would think they prefer to keep their own website current and,
> therefore, "competitive." I go straight to LUGNET and FBTB for the latest.
> Shame on TLG for abandoning details like that. Oh, and LEGO? If you're
> reading this, I would be honored if I became an employee with one
> purpose...guess.
>
> -Matt
>
> .
To point out when they are wrong? <g>
Jude
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lego starwars site
|
| No, to keep their site up-to-date. OK, I guess it could have been interpreted that way. Does anybody have an idea of the structure within TLG that handles the website? It's a safe guess that a team or department is responsible for the up-keep. I (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lego starwars site
|
| Stupid, isn't it? If TLG takes such an alleged interest in LUGNET, FBTB, etc...one would think they prefer to keep their own website current and, therefore, "competitive." I go straight to LUGNET and FBTB for the latest. Shame on TLG for abandoning (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
