 | | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H
|
|
(...) More likely (sorry, I don't have any references), the Tantive IV was registered as an Alderaanian ship. It would make sense for a Senator from Alderaan to use one of her home planet's ships. Also, Alderaan was a member of the Empire, but was (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H
|
|
(...) Remember, one should always devalue the information given in SW:EGVV by a goodly amount ... for example, it lists the height of the AT-AT as ~15m, which is much too small to be reconciled with the scenes in the movies [1]. EGVV does a nice job (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H
|
|
(...) <clip> (...) of (...) Well according to "Star Wars: The Essential Guide to Vechicles and Vessels" - [ The famous "Rebel Blockade Runner" in acutality was a single ship named the Tantive IV. A Corellian corvette, the ship was registered as a (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H
|
|
(...) Its funny but I actually think your suggestion is the only way to make the model look as it is supposed to. Most people will probably not keep it like that though. Yes I wanted grey parts but as a model it would have been more astheticly (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H
|
|
(...) would (...) IV. (...) Well the "Star Wars: Behind the Magic" CD-ROM it states; (not verbatim, but close enough) that the Empire belived the 'Rebel Blockade Runner' was a massive ship with enough firepower to defeat several Star Destroyers. (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
