 | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) The 1x4 is nice, but I find the viewscreen kind of annoying because it isn't nonspecific enough to use in any MOC. You'd have to use it in something that's attacking an AT-ST. ;^) ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (26 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) The AT-ST only sucks on three points in my opinion: (1) No Stormtrooper , (2) No AT-ST Driver, (3) The head does not turn left and right. I can correct the last myself, but the other two make upgrades expensive. On other bad news (relatively) (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Where are the 2001 SW sets?
|
| Skip, I've lost faith in TRU with the 2001 line. I'm on the road a lot, and I make a point to visit every WalMart and TRU on my route. Although WalMart's shelves were bare for a couple weeks after Christmas, they wasted no time replenishing every (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) To be honest, I LIKE the AT-ST. No, it's not a wonderful set overall. For $10, however, it is. If you can manage to prop the legs in the correct position, it can walk fairly well, and I think the way they have the hatch is set up nicely. (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) **snip of parts Mark likes** I'm also quite favorably disposed to the 1x4 brick with 4 side studs, not to mention the inverted 2x2 slope with viewscreen. Dave! (26 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
