 | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) Actually, going by the movies, an AT-AT's about 75 feet tall, which translates to about 525 mm in minifig scale which is about 65 studs tall... But 40 studs would about work for the often reported 50-feet height of the AT-AT, though... (...) (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) I would have thought that it might impact on sales of the Dark Side Developer's Kit (DSDK). I know they'd be very different models in appearance, but the big attraction of the DSDK is that it's a Lego AT-AT; that's why it takes centre image on (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 8007 versus 8008
|
| (...) A similar one, anyway: the new LOM value pack just arrived at Walmart here, and I found one on the shelf with a second copy of 7308, instead of the 7309. Too bad there's no cheap way to certify the shrinkwrap as original: I could probably get (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| | | | | Re: 8007 versus 8008
|
| Funny thing, I got them both at our TRU here in Binghamton NY today err yesterday now :). They were switched and still had the original seals. All parts, papers, ads, everything was there but they were switched. PS they had Cameraman from movie (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.ny.bin, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: 8007 versus 8008
|
| (...) Sorry, I meant "$39.9x". Cheers, Hao-yang Wang (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
|
