To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *10299 (-5)
  Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
 
Am I the only one here who LIKES the AT-ST? I mean it's not perfect, but for $10 it's a great set (and if it were much more, even as a better set, I probably wouldn't have bought it). I'm noticing less and less that TLC produces that I like, and so (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
 
(...) I think it's a crappy looking set, but I agree that the parts are great. I'm going out at lunch to look for more, in fact. :^) ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
 
(...) Ah, very nice. I was considering doing this myself. I think it would be good with the gray "lightsaber blade"/rod part added to the bottom so it's more pike-ish. (...) True, but I despise the off-color bricks in it. Bleah, bleah, bleah. <snip> (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Stormtroopers
 
(...) Gasp!!! Those aren't black Stormtroopers. Those are Tie Pilots ;P. As for other colors I highly doubt it unless they do an AT-AT Driver which would either be White, Maybe Gray, with a different printing. Otherwise I would say that the helmets (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
 
  Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
 
(...) <snip> (...) With the one caveat of the size, I think it's an excellent design, personally. (...) Err, well, the part that actually carries the six droids *does* fit in the MTT, which is accurate to the movie. The Battle Droid Carrier is (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR