Subject:
|
Re: Feedback and the role it plays in the modeling process (was Re: I'm back...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Jun 2001 22:41:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
34 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
<snip>
> Further, how can modelers get better if not by hearing from their peers on
> ways to improve?
>
> I dunno what to do about it. I admit I am one of the people that comments on
> the work of regulars (in my genres of interest anyway... for instance I
> always have something to say when James Mathis posts a new model) but
> sometimes overlooks the newcomers and their work.
My recommendation --
If your feelings are hurt that your model hasn't generated
any replies, a few days later, post a message noting that
you haven't received any feedback and that you'd appreciate
it if people could find something to say about it, in email
if not in the newsgroup.
If I know that your feelings are hurt, I might take more time
to form an opinion about the model than I otherwise might. Posting
a follow-up request noting that you'd really appreciate feedback
is a good way to let people know that you're anxiously awaiting
feedback.
If you're really hoping for feedback, it can't hurt to ask for
it a second time!
--
Jeff <jthompson@esker.com> "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
