 | | Re: No new space sets? —James Brown
|
| | | (...) Wow. You sure have a big Unhappy about LEGO...Don't you think you might be over-reacting a bit? James (URL) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: No new space sets? —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | | (...) This gives me some amusement because you could see the introduction of the minifigure and the first line of "classic space" as just being "concerned with making money and exploiting trends" as well. Star Wars was the rage by the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: No new space sets? —Patrick Leahy
|
| | | | (...) Okay, so maybe I didn't have the right info. At least they had good intent with Blacktron 1 and Spyrius. Fat chance finding a Star Wars set that good! (...) interesting when you post an angry message. So fun to watch people actually try to (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: No new space sets? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) Have you looked at a the Star Wars sets? I'd say that they're better than Spyrius and perhaps even Blacktron. (...) This isn't a very nice idea. People tend to take you seriously here, unless there's a reason not too. (And of course, if you (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: No new space sets? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) I agree totally. Its hard to take these terribly emotional inquisitive posts seriously anyways. Much less a whole barrage of them. -Tim (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: No new space sets? —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | Matthew already responded to this, but ... (...) Patrick, this is *way* uncool. It's called trolling or posting flame-bait - posting something inflammatory or provocative just for the pleasure of watching other people get upset. Trolls (people who (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
