To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 7839
7838  |  7840
Subject: 
Re: Et in Arcadia Lego Update -- The ButtBuster
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:56:33 GMT
Viewed: 
1914 times
  
In lugnet.space, Paul Hanson writes:
> I want one! No, not the model (though that would be cool) - but real life.
> It would be a blast to zoom around on that thing - and it looks like it
> would go REAL fast.
> 
> But seriously - nice interesting construction, good use of tan pieces, great
> details. Very well done.
> 
> In a way, I think a nicely done small model like this is more impressive
> than a really big one - it's much more challenging to get a nice shape & fit
> all the details on. Nice!
> 
> - Paul

why thank you, paul :-)

i have to say, i think that detail stands out better on a smaller MOC
because percentage-wise it makes up more of the visual area.  On a
larger MOC the brain is overwhelmed by size and volume of visuals
and can't really appreciate any particular detail.  A smaller MOC
is more polite to the neurons, giving them time to digest the
details.

any thoughts?

-paul



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Et in Arcadia Lego Update -- The ButtBuster
 
(...) I want one! No, not the model (though that would be cool) - but real life. It would be a blast to zoom around on that thing - and it looks like it would go REAL fast. But seriously - nice interesting construction, good use of tan pieces, great (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)

22 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR