Subject:
|
Re: Space stations?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:45:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5732 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 18:21:50 GMT, "Tom McDonald"
<radiotitan@spamcake.yahoo.com> wrote:
> Independent of doorframe construction, should doorway size itself matter here?
> It might look better.
Yes, there should be at least a minimum opening standard for each DP type.
The sealing surface spec will settle the question of maximum opening.
> > And any port which can also be used as a simple exit door must have a
> > complete airlock behind it. But that's a side issue.
>
> Well that's just plain good safety :-)
Depends on how absent-minded your crew is. And whether the safety locks
are reliable. :)
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Space stations?
|
| (...) very (...) Hmm, now that you mention it, mine sticks a bit too. "Snug" or "tight" would be appropriate terms for the M3 pocket doors. But that's because they're pocket types, the basic design concept that we both used. You've completely (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.space)
|
94 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
