To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 100
99  |  101
Subject: 
Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:45:20 GMT
Viewed: 
5783 times
  
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:19:59 GMT, "Tom McDonald"
<radiotitan@yanospamhoo.com> wrote:

Good, and I agree. Duane hasn't been as vocal as we have but I know he wants
that base :-) I do too, and the moon is a great place to start. And again I'll
just say that I think the first installation should be the Alpha-1 Rocket
Base. Plus the cool name of "Moonbase Alpha" is applicable too :-)

Hmm. Would we have to mark it as mobile? ;-)

So what's the nature of Moonbase LD-A?  Before we decide that, we should
decide on the background environment, so we'll know what's appropriate and
inappropriate.  I'll take that to another thread, 'kay?

My thinking behind using sectional units was only if someone ever wanted to
map out how space was being populated, or where their "cool spacebase" was, it
might be fun.

How big a chunk of space do you want to start with?  And should use real
space-time, or just make it up?  And what method of surveying do would be
best?  Where would the origin be?  Galactic center?  Sol?  Something
arbitrary?

I'm against using real space--there's too much research involved.  But if
someone *wants* to do the necessary research, don't let me stop 'em.

Maybe, if at all, were you thinking to label sections of space with more
proper names, such as "Badlands", "Star Nursery", or after major nearby stars,
and other terms like that?

Something like that.  But I'm not feeling a strong opinion here.

when replying, umm.. yeah. spamcake. find it. remove it.

Oh no!  He drew a blank!  Is this the beginning of the end for McSpamcake?
Stay tuned...

Or was it a very subtle, obscure movie reference that I missed?

Steve



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
 
(...) lol (...) k (...) Note below when you get there.* (...) Just to maintain some equality, should we stick with: 1 parsec = 3.26 light years = 30.8x10^12 km = 206,265 AU I vote yes, just so we can come out somewhat consistent. (...) Note below (...) (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.space)
  Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
 
(...) wants (...) I'll (...) Very funny! 8-) (...) I think the centre of the galaxy would be a good idea, if only as it will simplify the Maths! If we said that Earth was (0,0,0) then the x,y and z axes would be moving all the time. For one season (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
 
(...) I your idea better. (...) I'd rather keep it that 1 means the first thing. [...] (...) Good, and I agree. Duane hasn't been as vocal as we have but I know he wants that base :-) I do too, and the moon is a great place to start. And again I'll (...) (25 years ago, 28-Sep-99, to lugnet.space)

94 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR