To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 100
99  |  101
Subject: 
Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:45:20 GMT
Viewed: 
8035 times
  
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:19:59 GMT, "Tom McDonald"
<radiotitan@yanospamhoo.com> wrote:

> Good, and I agree. Duane hasn't been as vocal as we have but I know he wants
> that base :-) I do too, and the moon is a great place to start. And again I'll
> just say that I think the first installation should be the Alpha-1 Rocket
> Base. Plus the cool name of "Moonbase Alpha" is applicable too :-)

Hmm. Would we have to mark it as mobile? ;-)

So what's the nature of Moonbase LD-A?  Before we decide that, we should
decide on the background environment, so we'll know what's appropriate and
inappropriate.  I'll take that to another thread, 'kay?

> My thinking behind using sectional units was only if someone ever wanted to
> map out how space was being populated, or where their "cool spacebase" was, it
> might be fun.

How big a chunk of space do you want to start with?  And should use real
space-time, or just make it up?  And what method of surveying do would be
best?  Where would the origin be?  Galactic center?  Sol?  Something
arbitrary?

I'm against using real space--there's too much research involved.  But if
someone *wants* to do the necessary research, don't let me stop 'em.

> Maybe, if at all, were you thinking to label sections of space with more
> proper names, such as "Badlands", "Star Nursery", or after major nearby stars,
> and other terms like that?

Something like that.  But I'm not feeling a strong opinion here.

> when replying, umm.. yeah. spamcake. find it. remove it.

Oh no!  He drew a blank!  Is this the beginning of the end for McSpamcake?
Stay tuned...

Or was it a very subtle, obscure movie reference that I missed?

Steve



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
 
(...) lol (...) k (...) Note below when you get there.* (...) Just to maintain some equality, should we stick with: 1 parsec = 3.26 light years = 30.8x10^12 km = 206,265 AU I vote yes, just so we can come out somewhat consistent. (...) Note below (...) (27 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.space)
  Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
 
(...) wants (...) I'll (...) Very funny! 8-) (...) I think the centre of the galaxy would be a good idea, if only as it will simplify the Maths! If we said that Earth was (0,0,0) then the x,y and z axes would be moving all the time. For one season (...) (27 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
 
(...) I your idea better. (...) I'd rather keep it that 1 means the first thing. [...] (...) Good, and I agree. Duane hasn't been as vocal as we have but I know he wants that base :-) I do too, and the moon is a great place to start. And again I'll (...) (27 years ago, 28-Sep-99, to lugnet.space)

94 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR