Subject:
|
Re: Playing with the idea of docking ports again ...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:28:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1556 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jason S. Mantor wrote:
| |
I was trying to come up with a docking port that was bigger and
stronger than a Moonbase flange, but still compatable with it, and also
allowed vertical connections and connections at n X 90 degree rotations.
|
SNIP
I came up with this a while back:
in this thread: http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=15415.
I just updated links in latest post: http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=38984 (I
just added cause i realized it wasn’t in my b-shelf gallery for this new
thread).
The different colors show brick plate & pin pieces; the (poor) photo is my IRL
attempt which needed to be thicker to pull apart. The render just shows
proportion/locations of pegs & holes. The axle (blue rendered) peg can be
replaced with a brick/peg combo as with the others; it (blue peg) was supposed
to allow easier pull-apart-ability, increase stability & reduce shear on pegs by
keeping at least a peg in those locations (versus 2 pegs less, thus more shear).
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Playing with the idea of docking ports again ...
|
| I was trying to come up with a docking port that was bigger and stronger than a Moonbase flange, but still compatable with it, and also allowed vertical connections and connections at n X 90 degree rotations. I used MLCAD to experiment with (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jun-05, to lugnet.space)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
