 | | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) Another point on putting space train track on the edge of modules - it becomes vitally important that you follow a strict six-wide rule on your trains. i.e. not even half a plate of overhang is allowed for ladders or handles. The trains must (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) It was four directions so that however you put it together, it would make something compliant with the overall module standard. In the UK we're still using the 'Classic Moonbase' ;) standard, i.e. we haven't jacked ours up the extra bricks, (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) I think he means that the extra bits attached to the corridor assembly should not extend more than one plate below the corridor floor in order to keep the clearance for stuff passing underneath. --Bram (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) snip (...) Very nice. It looks pretty cool, and seems like it'd look even cooler in a moonbase module, especially clustered together. Why limit connections to just the 4 horizontal directions? I see a 3 dimensional array of spheres as (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
Awesome, Jason! Only problem is I can't decide which I like better, the Podule or those awesome corridors! Dave S. "Jason J Railton" <j.j.railton@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:IGJt7K.r6E@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) (URL) Spherical Podule>> (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space)
|
