 | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
actually i was gonna pull the old "its the end of my first semester of grad school and i was writing a few papers, resigning from lugnet, and just busy all around." this REALLY is NOT the way to bring something like this up. thanks for the vote of (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) My post had nothing to do with the speed at which you update the MOC Highlight, you are confusing that with my rant from a few months ago. In fact, you have been great about keeping it updated. (...) It isn't? Should I have taken it to the (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
to answer my own post- the other reason why there hasnt been an update is that there has just been so many great mocs the past few days.. i didnt know how to pick just one. but im gonna make a list and get the really really good ones up there.. (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) No you're right. I read a bit too quickly because I've been a little stressed lately. Your post was about me spotlighting someone who SHOULDN"T be spotlighted. I don't care about where Tom posted the FUGLI. Some manufactured rivalry between (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
this is supposed to be fun. the moc highlight isnt something worth ranting and raving about. keith thinks im a part of the space elite, and that i only put other members of the space elite on the highlight. fine. he thinks im doing a bad job. okay. (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) Actually, I questioned (questioned) whether or not he should be spotlighted when he doesnt post the moc to Lugnet, then I went off on an anti CSF rant. (...) Fair enough, all I was looking for was a little explanation...well, that and poke at (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) NOTE: Yes, this post is pointless and only fuels the fire, but I have to defend Keith. He's right. How wrong you are Keith. Don't you know the silent majority is always behind you! You speak for the common LUGNETer my friend! HUAH! BTW, I (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Hang in there, Dude (was Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight")
|
|
(...) Lenny, I'm not sure people realized everything you are up to, plus close involvement in several FOL sites. I certainly didn't. I just want to point out that in times like this, when you have so much going on, I've found it helpful to: * step (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) You're right, it is supposed to be fun, deep breath now, hold, exhale, good. To quote Walter, "Dude, you're being very un-Dude right now." And yes Lenny, I just compared you to the Dude from The Big Lebowski, which is very high praise indeed. (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) I agree, come back Lenny, we can work things out...it'll be different this time baby...I can quit the smack....really I can. Seriously, come back Lenny, lets bury the hatchet, smoke the peace pipe, make fun of Soren Roberts together. (...) (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) In danger of being pelted with bley bricks, I just was to say that I agree with what Mladen and Keith said. And now back to building... -- Nathan Wells (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) (pelts Nathan with reddish-brown bricks instead) ;-) -Tom McD. (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) (URL) Nathan, I'm sorry for your poor treatment as shown above. It was just Tuesday and I'm sure it still stings. As for all this "elitism" and "clubhouse" talk. I don't get it. Its about bricks and building better. CSF is not in competition (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) Don't bother writing me! Frank's in charge of taking resignations from people who really shouldn't be resigning. AND he's not accepting any right now. (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
I wasn't going to post (Lord knows I hardly ever do), but I did want to comment: I joined CSF when it first went up, but it quickly didn't seem all that friendly. No where near as friendly as lugnet.space; I realized that part of it is probably that (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) First off, I've got nothing whatsoever to say about Keith's post. That's his deal and I really don't have an opinion one way or another. And obviously I don't need to say anything to shut down your yawn-worthy elitist comment. It's that tired. (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space) !
|
